As a person who has paid money to a developer or builder who has then not handed over the property, you have the right to a solution to your problem. Under a new law passed by the government known as the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, you have the right to file a complaint before a special body set up for real estate projects known as the Real Estate Regulatory Authority. You can also access consumer courts or file criminal complaints. In certain situations, you can also start an ‘arbitration’ proceeding or file a complaint before the Competition Commission of India. Read more about these options below.
Under a new law, states have to establish Regulatory Authority which is a special body dealing with the real estate sector. Here’s what you need to know about the law with respect to your particular problem:
They are not required to register projects which are very small - if the area of the land which is going to be developed is less than 500 square meters and the number of apartments is less than eight. This exemption might differ from state to state.
Every state and union territory is supposed to have such an authority and an appellate tribunal. Since this is a very recent law (important provisions came into force on May 1, 2017) and a number of states have not yet set up authorities, you will need to check if the state in which the property is located has set up the Regulatory Authority and Appellate Tribunal to see if this option is available in the first place.
The new law states that the Regulatory Authority should endeavour to dispose of the complaints within 60 days (Section 71 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016) from the date of filing. However, the Authority can take more time and is only required to record the reasons for not completing the proceeding within the 60 day period.
No, if the Regulatory Authority has been set up in your state, you cannot file a case before a civil court or file a civil writ petition before the High Court. Recently, some High Courts have in fact been directing those who file civil writ petitions before it to approach the Regulatory Authority in that state. However, since this is a very new law and some states may not have set up a regulatory authority, you might still have the option of filing a civil case.
Generally, the law does not let you litigate in two different courts for the same dispute or grievance. This does not include non-legal remedies like approaching CREDAI. Also, for a case that can be decided by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, you cannot simultaneously file a case for the same remedies in the civil court (Section 79 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016). (However, you may have the option to approach civil courts if the state government has not yet set up a Regulatory Authority.) Alternatively, there are other places you can look at for a solution - for example, filing a case before the consumer forum is also an option. Also depending on the situation, some other options include arbitration, insolvency applications and filing criminal complaints are available.
Since choosing of alternative remedies requires in depth analyses of facts and forums, it is always advisable to consult a lawyer before proceeding with any remedy.
(If there is no real estate Regulatory Authority in your state,) you can file a civil case in the area where the apartment is located or where the builder carries on his business.
The remedies that can be obtained from a Civil Court are:
One advantage of approaching a civil court is that obtaining temporary orders may be easier. However, generally cases in civil courts are time consuming and require court fees which are dependent on the amount of claim
If there is an arbitration clause in your agreement, then you should refer your case to the arbitrator (and not go to a civil court). Arbitration is a private method of resolving a dispute by referring it to an independent third party called as arbitrator. This person will then decide whether the builder has not followed the terms of the agreement in relation to handing over and compensation.
Arbitration is supposed to be a quicker solution than a general civil case. Even though you do not have to pay court fees, both you and the builder will have to pay the fees of the arbitrator. The arbitrator can at best give a decree (order) confirming the default by the builder and the compensation. The buyer should approach the civil court for enforcing the arbitrator’s order. This may make it time consuming.
In situations where the builder or developer is purposely not handing over possession of the property in order to keep the money for herself, you can also file a criminal complaint. There are provisions in the general law of crimes, the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which punishes such crimes (for example, cheating (Section 415 of IPC 1860) and criminal breach of trust (Section 405 of IPC 1860)).
Generally, a criminal case may be a completed quicker than a regular civil case. Also, the court fees involved is minimal. If the builder is found guilty, the court may send her to jail which might make her more diligent in settling claims. However, there is no assured monetary compensation even if the builders are found guilty.
If you have bought the property for a residential purpose or if the rent from the property is your source of livelihood (for example, when the builder is building the property on your land), you can file a consumer complaint instead of going to the Real Estate Regulatory Authority or a civil court. You are able to make a complaint as a consumer because you have paid for a service from the builder and there is a deficiency (Section 2 of The Consumer Protection Act 1986) in this service.
You can file a complaint with the District Consumer Forum (Section 11 of The Consumer Protection Act 1986) if the value of the property and compensation you are claiming is less than Rs. 20 lakh. If this is between Rs. 20 lakh and Rs. 1 crore, you have to file the complaint with the State Consumer Commission (Section 17 of The Consumer Protection Act 1986). If this is above Rs. 1 crore, you have to file the complaint with the National Commission (Section 21 of The Consumer Protection Act 1986). The complaint should be filed within two years (Section 24A of The Consumer Protection Act 1986) from the date on which you were supposed to get possession.
Approaching a consumer forum generally means a quicker end to the case. Also, getting temporary relief, compensation and a settlement with the builder is easier. The complaint fee is very nominal and not based on the value of the claim (like in a civil court). However, if the property value is above Rs.20 lakh or Rs.1 crore, then you can only file the complaint before the State Commission or National Forum.
Source: Nyaaya
https://static.vikaspedia.in/mediastorage/image/cChat-Bot-Icons_Hindi.png
Last Modified : 8/10/2023