Nagalapur in Raichur district is a small village consisting of 140 households. Majority of them are small farmers belonging to Lingayat, SC and Madivala communities. Situated at the tail end area of the Tungabhadra canal project, some have access to irrigation. However, for the last five years, the village has not received any water from this source, making the farms completely rainfed. Sorghum, cotton and sunflower are the major crops. The black soil areas prevailing in the village, however, make it ideal for growing cotton. Cotton is grown under monocropping system. Increasing use of purchased inputs has made cotton crop less remunerative.
Basavarajappa is a small farmer from Lingayat community aged 38 and had schooling upto fourth standard. He belonged to a joint family consisting of 12 members. Besides, working on their own farm, the family members also work for wages to meet the household needs. In lean periods, male members of the family migrate to nearby cities in search of work. Basavarajappa owns 4 acres of dry land. He cultivates cotton, sorghum and sunflower. He has been growing cotton as a mono crop, the most common practice in the region. Common practice is to apply farm yard manure once in three years while chemicals like Urea, DAP and Complex fertilizers are applied every season at the rate of 50 kg per acre. Seeds are bought from the retail shops and directly sown in the field. Generally, 5-6 pesticide sprays with chemicals like Monocrotophos, Endosulfan, Quinolphos are used both as preventive and curative measures. With all these practices he was harvesting about 5 quintals of cotton per acre, on an average.
Basavarajappa is an active member in the group. He participated in the Farmers Field School organized by AME Foundation. He earmarked one acre of his land to practice various alternative farming practices.
The piece of land allotted to FFS was ploughed during summer to capture the early rains. This was followed by ploughing the land thrice before sowing. Farm bunds were repaired and inter-bunds were made to retain the soil moisture better. Jatropha and glyricedia were planted on the bunds, for two purposes. One to protect the bunds and second, to generate additional plant biomass to be converted to organic manure. Sheep penning was done to enrich the soil.
Breaking the mono cropping pattern, other crops like red gram, lady’s finger and cowpea seeds were included with cotton. Red gram was used as a border crop, lady’s finger and cowpea were scattered in the main crop, as trap crops. Pest management activities started right from seed treatment. Seeds were treated with Trichoderma and PSB before sowing. Neem leaf extract, which has pesticidal properties, was sprayed thrice at an interval of 15 – 20 days. Chemical sprays were now restricted to two, that too during the peak incidence of bollworm in the month of September.
With alternative eco-friendly practices, Basavarajappa was able to harvest 8 quintals of cotton, a marginal increase of 6.25% over his usual practice plot. However, his biggest gain was in terms of drastic reduction in production costs, due to lower usage of chemicals. Fertiliser usage declined by 60% (applied only 50 kg of Complex fertiliser as against 150 kg of all kinds of fertilisers) and pesticide usage declined from 6 sprays to 2 sprays. With the reduction in chemical use, there was significant reduction in the cultivation costs too – fertiliser cost by 39%; pesticide cost by 77%; total cost reduction by 38%.
Crops other than cotton became a source of food for the family - one quintal each of red gram along with lady’s finger, and 30-35 kilos of cowpea were harvested, which was utilized for home consumption. Other significant gains which Basavarajappa realises is the gain in his knowledge level with regards to pest management. With FFS training, he
is now able to recognise and names of useful insects like Ladybird beetle and Chrysopa.
S.No | Activity | Control plot | Trial plot | Difference (%) |
1 | Production cost | |||
Land preparation | 600 | 600 | ||
Manures and fertilizers | 1650 | 1000 | -39.40% | |
Seeds and seed treatment | 700 | 715 | ||
Pest and disease management | 2380 | 550 | -76.90% | |
Labour | 1050 | 1050 | ||
Total | 6380 | 3915 | -38.60% | |
2 | Yield (kgs) | 750 | 800 | 6.25% |
3 | Gross returns (Rs) | 16500 | 17600 | 6.66% |
4 | Net returns | 10120 | 13685 | 35.22% |
Benefits from cotton cultivation motivated group members to try alternative farming practices in a food crop like sorghum. Sorghum was being grown as a subsistence crop, primarily for home consumption. Sorghum crop never received much attention in terms of building soil fertility or in pest management. With AMEF’s guidance, Basavarajappa adopted certain alternative farming practices. Land was ploughed across the slope to retain the soil moisture. About 20 cartloads of farmyard manure was applied. Safflower was grown as a border crop to protect sorghum from cattle grazing and bengal gram as an intercrop. The seeds of sorghum and bengal gram were treated with PSB before sowing. Sorghum seed rate was reduced to two kilos from the usual three kilos. Following optimum spacing, Basavarajappa observed that the reduced seed rate helped in maintaining a better plant population. This in turn enhanced plant growth with bigger ear heads. The size of the stem and leaves was almost double the size of those in the control plot. As a plant protection measure neem extract was sprayed twice to control the aphids. By following alternative practices, the cost of cultivation increased, primarily due to additional land ploughing and application of purchased FYM. However, with Basavarajappa producing organic manure on his own farm, it is anticipated that the cost would reduce gradually. Despite the high cost of production, Basavarajappa was able to get higher net returns. He harvested 9 quintals of sorghum, which was double than
what he was getting before. The fodder yield also doubled from a level of 2 tons/ac to 4 tons/ac. Additionally, he got 60 kilos of Bengal gram and 60 kilos of safflower, which yielded 9 kilos of oil.
S.No | Activity | Control plot | Trial plot | Difference (%) |
Ploughing | 400 | 2000 | 400% | |
FYM | - | 900 | ||
Seeds and seed treatment | 94 | 65 | -30% | |
Labour | 880 | 880 | ||
1 | Production cost | 1374 | 3845 | 179% |
2 | Yield- kgs | 400 | 2900 | 125% |
3 | Gross returns | 2400 | 7410 | 208% |
4 | Net returns | 1026 | 3565 | 247% |
Source : AME Foundation
Last Modified : 3/1/2020